<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft to Secure the Web?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.shaftek.org/blog/2005/03/29/microsoft-to-secure-the-web/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.shaftek.org/blog/2005/03/29/microsoft-to-secure-the-web/</link>
	<description>ShafTek.org = SHAFranovich TECHnologies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 15:43:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BVD</title>
		<link>http://www.shaftek.org/blog/2005/03/29/microsoft-to-secure-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-171</link>
		<dc:creator>BVD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 16:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shaftek.org/blog/2005/03/29/microsoft-to-secure-the-web/#comment-171</guid>
		<description>Sounds to me like no new patents will be involved, nor does it even look like new code for Longhorn.  My guess is this is just a rebranded version of the failed MS Wallet program.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2002/sep02/09-02WalletPR.asp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2002/sep02/09-02WalletPR.asp&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds to me like no new patents will be involved, nor does it even look like new code for Longhorn.  My guess is this is just a rebranded version of the failed MS Wallet program.<br />
<a href="http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2002/sep02/09-02WalletPR.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2002/sep02/09-02WalletPR.asp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.446 seconds -->

